Rachel Crader is the editor of semoball.com. She graduated from the University of Missouri School of Journalism in May of 2009 before spending the summer covering the World Series of Poker in Las Vegas.

Highlights from Rachel's days in college include having a class down the hall from Chase Daniel and having NCAA wrestling champion Ben Askren hold the door open for her at Brady Commons, Mizzou's student center. She spent time covering Mizzou basketball, softball and baseball while working for the Columbia Missourian and is excited to return home to Southeast Missouri to cover local sports for semoball.com.

Rachel has covered three Southeast Missourian Christmas Tournaments for the Southeast Missourian and semoball.com, and she'll see you courtside again this year.

SEMO Conference Tournament Bracket

Posted Saturday, December 3, 2011, at 4:26 PM

Here is the bracket, complete with time for all the games: http://semoball.com/bracket/1318/

Who's going to win?

Comments

View 62 comments

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Hey, Crader, are you gonna post all the tournament scores from tonights Farmington tournament???

-- Posted by Dexter Native on Sat, Dec 3, 2011, at 5:00 PM
I would like to present: The SEMO Conference Tournament Dissertation. One change: knowing that Big Darius Brown is not competing next week (per the information relayed by SemoSports), I would say that Charleston defeats Cape more convincingly than first thought.

(1) SIKESTON vs. (8) DEXTER--My team is back and didn't seem to have missed too many beats since last March (credit that to the fact most of these kids never stopped playing). Dexter is in a down period. Expect the Bulldogs to roll.

(4) NOTRE DAME vs. (5) JACKSON--I don't believe either team has played a game yet. I've heard good things about the Indians but ND has a lot of good guards. If the Blue Dogs are able to adjust quickly to a life without their former double team drawing machine in Tolbert, I think they win this game.

(2) CHARLESTON vs. (7) NEW MADRID--Saw both of these teams play at the Riverbend. Charleston has the Tucker-Parham show and has started to get some more out of their role players. I expect them to run through this game without much issue.

(3) CAPE CENTRAL vs. (6) POPLAR BLUFF--Cape has the inside presence of the Tisdell-Brown combination. Bluff is working through a rebuilding period. I think Cape is going to pull this one out as long the Mules hold them to another thirty point total (Please, for the love of the fans, don't make this another 36-29 game).

SEMI-FINALS: (1) SIKESTON vs. (4) NOTRE DAME--Both teams will have a lot of shooters. The difference is that the Red Dogs have more experience and more guys to run in. While ND is always very conditioned and rivalry games can sometimes lead to surprises, I think that the Red Dogs pull out another win in the rivalry.

(2) CHARLESTON vs. (3) CAPE CENTRAL--The toughest game for me to pick probably due to the contrasting strengths each team has. Both teams rely primarily on a couple of players and neither one relies on major depth. Cape has the size while Charleston has the speed/conditioning. I think it depends on which team dictates the tempo of the game as well as how Big Darius Brown continues to acclimate himself into the Cape system. Apparently, he has talent in finding the open man and was an assist machine in his first game (Doesn't Cape ALWAYS seem to have a guy who is an 'assist machine'?) along with being a big body on the floor. Can Tucker, Parham, Cassell, Hull, and the rest of that team get their shots in to win the game? I think so though it will be a hard fought contest. Charleston wins.

FINALS: THE RIVALRY-(1) SIKESTON vs. (2) CHARLESTON--It is a game that people have been geared up for since the end of last season. How does the combo that many are calling the most talented in SEMO, Tucker and Parham, compete with the stable of horses that Sikeston brings to the table. I think they play pretty well. However, two things will lead to what I believe will be Charleston's (or Cape's if they win) downfall. They interconnect as well. First of all, I can only name a grand total of one other team in the state of Missouri that can run as many different players on the floor as Sikeston does and not drop in talent (Soldan). As proven last night, the second five of Sikeston has as much, if not more talent in some spots than the first five. It was discussed all last year and should be discussed again. The players that come off the bench of an opponent are just as important in a Sikeston game as the starters are. Neither Charleston nor Cape have the breadth of guys waiting in the wings. At some point, either the top players will have to get out of the game or they will get tired. This leads into the second point in Sikeston's favor. Whoever makes the finals between Cape and Charleston is probably going to have to beat up the other in a physical game to get there. I don't care how conditioned the team is, look at the last two years in Class 3, District 1. Playing against two high quality opponents on back-to-back nights can really take a toll on a team, espectially in the beginning of the season when players haven't completely found their basketball form. The amount of depth Sikeston has as well as the high pressure and constant motion they create will wear down just about anyone. Even teams that try to control the tempo eventually start having to speed up. I think that it will be a great final between Sikeston and Charleston but the the Bulldogs have the advantage in maybe not the best player but the best overall team. I think they win 78-69.

-- Posted by sideline starter on Sat, Dec 3, 2011, at 11:57 PM
Sideline I never said how ling he is suspended for I just know he will miss the bluff game for sure.

I think sikeston beats ND pretty bad, notre Dame has always relyed on a big man to draw attention away from the perimeter leaving their shooters open and they wont have that luxury this year. I don't know if sikeston is more experienced, ND returned 3 starters from last year with 1 or 2 more rotating in with that starters. Whoever wins between cape and charleston will make a great championship game against sikeston.

-- Posted by CapeAlum on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 1:12 AM
You don't know if their more experienced? Were returning 4 players that saw time in all 30 games last year including the state championship game. They've played and all had a huge impact role in the biggest games of their lives. Our varsity this year played Corey, janiel, will, and Darryl everyday last year. And all four of them are playing a sport in college. Sikeston is by far the most experienced team in the SEMO area. And it shows on the court with the players basketball IQ,

Why I think we will make it a four peat this year:

1. Our shooting, we have yet to be forced to get the ball down low to Keldon and JT for our points, we can shoot it anywhere on the court, with multiple people. Every player can shoot the ball effiecntly somewhere on the court.

2. Our depth, we have players who come off the bench who can end up being the leading scorer of any game. That second 4-5 have done a great job this year so far and you have to realize they've only played three varsity games. They are only going to get better.

3. Our defense, we transition pretty well, our press needs a little bit of work. But were getting tons of steals per game, and we cause quite a few turnovers. Our zone has been spot on so far and your going to have to shoot just as good as us to beat us, and I honestly don't think anyone has even half the amount of shooters as us.

The cape charelston game is the most interesting game besides what should be the championship game. If sikeston meets cape or charelston in the finals it's going to be a good night of basketball with a great atmosphere

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 12:42 PM
ND had the same amount of players back that played a lot last year except ND started more underclassmen than sikeston. The only difference is the sikeston players played through the playoffs.

-- Posted by CapeAlum on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 3:58 PM
SemoSports, Sikeston has more experience on the big stage and more guys who saw significant varsity action last year. They have five guys who saw ample time and made contributions. I think of them as being the more experienced team. Take that for what it is worth.

Does anyone think that Cape may need to be put on upset alert against Bluff? The Mules went 2-1 at the Quincy round robin and Cape has not come out great so far this season.

-- Posted by sideline starter on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 4:37 PM
ND lost by 8-10 to Borgia this weekend.

-- Posted by FarmBoy06 on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 4:38 PM
It was 62-52 Farm. Apparently, the score hovered around a 7-12 point lead for Borgia for most of the game.

-- Posted by sideline starter on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 4:40 PM
Yeah, sounds like it was more than that at times. Man I'm hoping I'll be back in the SEMO area for good before this season is over...I've been missing basketball season the past couple years.

-- Posted by FarmBoy06 on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 4:42 PM
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.... Don't come back!!! LOL... Just kidding, I know we don't always agree but it is always fun debating with you on your favorite teams and my favorite team!

Still see Sikeston being tough for each team.

Charleston would have to get my vote as the other team in the Finals now if Darius Brown isn't playing for Cape. (I hope mentioning this kids name isn't an issue, Hemingway?)

-- Posted by Haterade on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 5:45 PM
They have experience losing, you forget this years seniors are still unbeaten, reigning three time semo conference champs, reigning 3 time district champs, and reigning state champs. But that's not experience.

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 6:29 PM
I don't think ND's junior or sophomore classes have ever beat ours

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 6:30 PM
One state title in school history and your head gets even bigger than it already was. Dang.

-- Posted by FarmBoy06 on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 6:54 PM
Were talking about experience here bro, not prestige, not history, not my big head. Were talking about how sikestons top 10 players have more skill and more experience and most importantly more wins.

You can try again though!

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 7:02 PM
And for the record, I'm going to pick us to win every game. I always have, that state title doesn't effect me claiming how good we are. It just feels amazing to throw around

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 7:06 PM
Alright big man, you got me. What's embarassing is Sikeston is obviously the much better team this year, yet you're worried about some argument about experience. Who the hell cares?

-- Posted by FarmBoy06 on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 7:06 PM
Obviously you do, because you mad. Why you mad? What's semoball for? For everyone to agree? I thought it was to debate sports issues. But hey that ND diploma makes you smarter then me right

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 7:12 PM
Did sikeston beef up their schedule any after last year? I know most of their game slots were already full but I'm sure there were a few open days.

-- Posted by CapeAlum on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 7:26 PM
And I like arguing with semosports 1&2

And that rector game last night was suppose to be against Clarksville, who took second at state last year or won it? And I thought we were in the cape shootout this year? And were still in the St. Dominic tournament

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 7:30 PM
Farm....I normally respect your insights....I really do. I know we have our disagreements....but come on man! Sikeston finally wins a state title and you say "one state title in school history.....blah, blah, blah...." I knew someone would say that, but I'm surprised it was you. C'mon man!!

-- Posted by Rocket689 on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 7:30 PM
Clarksville, AR won Class 4A in Arkansas last year. We are also playing Imagine Prep in the Cape Shootout. I would say that we have upgraded our schedule, although I don't think we needed to do so. 30-0 speaks for itself!

-- Posted by Rocket689 on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 7:33 PM
Cape will get to see two of the best juniors in the state go at it with Payne and Ruffin

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 7:36 PM
Ruby, Clarksville was Arkansas Class 4 state champ last year. They dropped out of Rector late due to an invite to the Jonesboro Invitational tournament where they got fourth losing to Maplewood in the third place game. We are in St. Dominic again for Christmas. They treated us well last year and as always, Sikeston struggles in finding a Christmas tournament since Poplar Bluff no longer likes to include local teams and out of state tournaments are never fun.

SemoSports, we dropped Park Hills Central (mediocre Class 4 team) to pick up what was originally a game with Clarksville. We also dropped Warren County to get into the Cape Shootout where we were originally scheduled to play Maplewood though that has now been changed to playing Imagine Prep. (I guess dropping PHC and Henry County isn't the true technical term. We played each of them home and away and I guess mutually decided not to renew.) I wouldn't say that this is a substantial upgrade but it isn't like we need to start pursuing nationally ranked teams or anything. Plus, Charleston and Caruthersville are both better than last year and are really good teams in the state amongst others we play. So that's where it is right now.

-- Posted by sideline starter on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 7:40 PM
Alright I was just curious, thought you guts were supposed to be in our tiger shootout last year but something happened where you didn't get in.

Come on now rocket, I say the only reason a team should go undefeated in basketball is if they have a team full of big time D1 talent. Otherwise they are playing teams below they're caliber. Besides, SCC seemed to do fine beefing up their schedule each year. That was partly because teams wanted to see Otto but still.

-- Posted by CapeAlum on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 9:16 PM
I typed Warren County once in the above post. Meant to put Henry County.

On a different note, I just spent a bit of time combing through rankings, state champions, and 30+ game winners on the Internet and found that as of right now, Sikeston's streak of 33 wins in a row is the fourth longest active streak in the nation if my numbers were correct.

-- Posted by sideline starter on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 9:42 PM
If Oak Hill played sikestons schedule they would be underrated over the past 30 years..

-- Posted by Bill Shakespeare on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 9:47 PM
Undefeated** (Autocorrect)

-- Posted by Bill Shakespeare on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 9:49 PM
That was a terrible comparison.

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 9:54 PM
Your point? I just thought it was a neat statistic. You've gotta be on your game to win that many in a row. I'm not saying they are a team that should be nationally ranked. Just showing where their streak currently is.

-- Posted by sideline starter on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 9:54 PM
My point is as much as you guys care(trying to start fights with other schools students.. Really??) and talk about sikeston and how good they are/ could be in the scheme of the basketball world, you fail in comparison.. And sideline I will give you this I do enjoy reading your material it's mostly the other sikeston posters..

FYI.. My money is on Urhahn

-- Posted by Bill Shakespeare on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 10:14 PM
Oak Hill isn't a true high school. It's a basketball academy that takes players from all over the country. I don't think those teams (Oak Hill, Findlay Prep, Mt. Zion, etc.) should be considered in national high school rankings. That's just my opinion.

As far as schedules, Sikeston's is just fine. Obviously they are doing something right. They went 30-0....why mess with what's working? The only thing that I'm sure they would change would be getting in the Cape Christmas Tournament so they don't have to travel all over creation to play in one.

-- Posted by semohoops on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 10:15 PM
MakeItRain, we have a lot of pride in our school, sports programs, basketball team, and their accomplishments in Sikeston. It isn't too often a team around here can have a win streak like this other than SCC and Charleston a couple of times back in the day (some LONG streaks back then). I don't see why having pride is such a problem. We do have a bit of a chip-on-our-shoulder complex down here since we have been a top team in our class going on seven years now yet never could break through. Now that we have, the mentality that we have had for so long is essentially engrained in us anyway. It is a little like the Red Sox before they won in '04 where every year seemed like it came so close but something would get in the way. Now that we have a title, we will see how many bandwagoners in the town jump on.

On a different note, as has been stated all over this website, the fact that Sikeston doesn't get in with some of these powerhouse schools isn't their fault. We haven't had a top 50 player in the nation and we aren't quite a "name brand" school like an SCC or Borgia is since they have so many state titles and such. Also, we aren't in a city like St. Louis so some people doubt us even though I maintain that SEMO teams can compete with STL teams pretty well. All this crap about fights with students or whatever you are talking about, I don't know what you mean. I'm going to assume you aren't referring to me.

-- Posted by sideline starter on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 10:33 PM
I just don't see how it's that hard to beef up a schedule. We do it all the time in football and baseball, our basketball schedule is just right for us so there's no need yo change it. In football we'll play big stl schools like parkway north and eureka. Although we didn't the past two years due to having to finish contracts with other schools and having to play some different teams because of dropping a class. In baseball we play some of the top teams in the state every year and go to Memphis and play teams from around the country. I just don't understand how it's that difficult in basketball when you can play any day of the week and multiple games a week.

-- Posted by CapeAlum on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 10:50 PM
No clue what your talking about.

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 10:51 PM
I think Sikeston will play in the Championship against Charleston and I think it will be a up and down game with both teams being in control at certain times. I think the first 3 quarters will be close and then feel that Sikeston's depth will start to play its part. Sikeston should be able to run full speed longer than Charleston and win in the end by about 12.

ONLY WORRY is Notre Dame playing us TOUGH like always!

Haven't been able to make a game yet but have been following on the radio and would like to know if there might be another radio station besides 1400 and 1520 covering these games cause both of them are terrible. One dude on 1400 sounds like he has shots lined up in front of him and takes one each time the whistle blows. By the end of the game he sounds completely drunk and slurs his words really bad. The other station, 1520 has a play by play guy who is good at his job but his voice gets annoying after a quarter and his color guy says uhhhh,uhhhh all the time along with repeating almost EVERYTHING the play by play guy says. If you know of another station that will carry these game I would love to hear them. I have heard the local coverage since football and don't know how much longer I can take it...

Now to all the other crap:

After reading the last couple days of post on semoball...I now know why people hate the fans from Sikeston!!!

I don't think the kids on the teams are the problem. It is the fans who just look for something to complain about or have to continually boast about us,us,us. IT REALLY IS GETTING OLD!!!! Also, before any of you try to tell me "if I don't like it I don't have to read it" or "you don't have to post then if you don't like it" I am just telling you as a Sikeston fan I TOTALLY understand why people say what they do about us!

-- Posted by straightswaggin on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 11:19 PM
That's neat

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Sun, Dec 4, 2011, at 11:22 PM
jut whot are you saying staigwaggering? i for one sometime do just do jst like the bulldogs but not th e noter dame bulldogs. dustin ruy i do just not think you know anything you talk about Bucko.

-- Posted by bearcat1forall on Mon, Dec 5, 2011, at 9:57 AM
It is a shame swaggin that sometimes people lump the whole population in with a few!

-- Posted by mmorse on Mon, Dec 5, 2011, at 11:17 AM
If Charleston plays Sikeston in the championship I dont think depth will have alot to do with the outcome. Sikeston lost what, 4 or 5 starters? Charleston lost one. Charleston plays ten guys too, who all went to state last year. The same 5 that start at tip off wont be in at the same time most of the game. I think it will all come down to how hard fought of a game the Cape Charleston game will be, assuming we get past new madrid with ease. Being on Sikestons court and playing a tough Cape team the game before will definetly give and edge to sikeston assuming charleston and sikeston play in the championship. I think it will be a really close game, but im going to say Charleston pulls it out. Just because my blood runs blue, and I can. Charleston 68 Sikeston 67

-- Posted by Hershisers and Old Fashioned's on Mon, Dec 5, 2011, at 12:24 PM
i thinks you mite be drinking on the coolaide there Bucko herkshisers. u relly think that charleston will beat skiston? i do not just do not at all.

-- Posted by bearcat1forall on Mon, Dec 5, 2011, at 12:43 PM
swaggin....that's a pretty broad stroke you just painted. What specifically are you referring?

-- Posted by Rocket689 on Mon, Dec 5, 2011, at 1:37 PM
How good your bench is really comes in affect in a game like Charleston/Sikeston. I know Charleston has Tucker and Parham but who other than that will hang with these players from Sikeston? Sikeston seems to always have a deep bench. Are there any players from Charleston that will step up late in the 3rd and 4th quarters? I'm curious to see how it all plays out. Are there any upsets possible in the first round?

-- Posted by Cheesehead. on Mon, Dec 5, 2011, at 3:41 PM
Cheese, watch the score of the Bluff-Cape game. I don't know how Cape will do against a quality school while missing talent. And I guess Jackson-ND is a tossup but a 5 beating a 4 isn't a huge upset.

-- Posted by sideline starter on Mon, Dec 5, 2011, at 3:46 PM
Cheese....I will let the Charleston faithful field the question about who is on their bench.

I can address the first round games. The only "upset" I see...and I'm not sure I would call it an upset, would be #5 Jackson beating #4 ND. Again, I'm not sure that is an upset, but it's the only likely one in the first round. I don't see NMCC beating Charleston or PB beating Cape.

Are you coming to any of the games, Cheese?

-- Posted by Rocket689 on Mon, Dec 5, 2011, at 3:47 PM
Let me restate my comment after I re-read it. I don't mean to imply that Jackson is GOING to beat ND, I just think that they could and by the seedings, it would be a "presumed" upset. That is the only one I really see that COULD happen in the first round.

-- Posted by Rocket689 on Mon, Dec 5, 2011, at 3:48 PM
Well if I do come it would be on Thursday or Friday. Cville plays Kennett tomorrow so you know where i'll be that night. Not sure on Cville's schedule the rest of the week but I'll let ya know in a day or two

-- Posted by Cheesehead. on Mon, Dec 5, 2011, at 3:54 PM
Ok, sounds good.

-- Posted by Rocket689 on Mon, Dec 5, 2011, at 4:38 PM
Little note Sikeston has 2 state titles one in track an one in basketball.I know they stressing one title didnt know if they were referring to basketball as a whole....lmbo

-- Posted by stlfan38 on Mon, Dec 5, 2011, at 5:40 PM
Who other than tucker and parham will be able to hang with these players from sikeston? Are you inferring that all sikestons players (ones who will get most pt) are as good as tucker and parham? Do you think sikeston is dominate at every position? Im not trying to suade anyone from there vote, just think our guys have a good shot.

-- Posted by Hershisers and Old Fashioned's on Tue, Dec 6, 2011, at 11:58 AM
Tucker and parham are great players. Tucker is the best player in the whole tournament, but best team wise I'd have to go with sikeston.

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Tue, Dec 6, 2011, at 12:16 PM
I agree Dustin. Sikeston has proven they are the best team. Until they are beaten. Im just saying it wont be an easy w for sikeston. Charleston will make it close and hopefully pull it out. You never know, thats why the game is played. As much as bearcats comment almost made me move to sikeston and become a bulldog faithful, im gonna stick with my prediction of a one point bluejay victory. yes bucko, i relly think that we could beat skiston. I just do just do at all.

-- Posted by Hershisers and Old Fashioned's on Tue, Dec 6, 2011, at 12:44 PM
It'll definitely be a good game! Two of the best teams in the state going at it. I don't think anyone thinks it'll be a blowout. But I believe that sikeston will come out on top by about 8-10. We can agree to disagree haha

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Tue, Dec 6, 2011, at 12:54 PM
Charleston can pull it off if they focus on playing as a team because they have several talented players, even though only two are recognized. I believe Thursday and Friday night will speak for those silent players along with the other two. Lets go Bluejays!!!!!! TEAM BALL!!!!!!!!!!

-- Posted by silentplayer on Tue, Dec 6, 2011, at 8:03 PM
Doesn't Sikeston have to play Notre Dame and Charleston have to play Cape first? Not saying either one will lose, but can we get through the Thursday night games first??

-- Posted by mmorse on Tue, Dec 6, 2011, at 8:54 PM
If you think charelston doesn't have a chance to win it then your just being extremely bias. They have a great team and I can't wait until we play them

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Tue, Dec 6, 2011, at 9:04 PM
for Charleston, Tuck and Ryan are without a doubt two of the best perimeter players in the area, however i cant believe no one has mentioned Jamaul (midrange) and Krush (lowpost). These guys deserve recognition as well.

-- Posted by hoopaholiczanon on Tue, Dec 6, 2011, at 9:36 PM
Besides those four guys who does charelston have that could make an impact.

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Tue, Dec 6, 2011, at 9:49 PM
Mike Hull fills it up pretty good. Charleston does some things defensively that could create some problems for teams. They had about three different looks defensively the other night verse NMCC.

-- Posted by bb4life on Wed, Dec 7, 2011, at 9:48 AM
They also start cassel who is a senior guard and can shoot it, and Watkins who is a jr will get plenty pt

-- Posted by Hershisers and Old Fashioned's on Wed, Dec 7, 2011, at 12:29 PM
But are those players the same caliber as the sikeston players coming off the bench? Sikestons second 5 can score just as many as the starting 5, which enables us to keep that hectic pace all game effectively

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Wed, Dec 7, 2011, at 3:48 PM
Mike Hull and Aaron Cassell(starter) are great 3 pt shooters as well as two of the best defensive players I have seen. And I believe a team must play both offense and defense to win a game. As far as the same caliber, I believe Thursday and Friday night will speak loudly for those coming off the bench. Let's Go Blue Jays!!!!!!

-- Posted by silentplayer on Wed, Dec 7, 2011, at 5:51 PM
I wasn't saying that they weren't, I was just asking. I really don't know that much about them. Everyone knows their a great team and very well coached.

-- Posted by Dustin Ruby on Wed, Dec 7, 2011, at 6:37 PM

Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration:

If you already have an account, follow this link to login
Otherwise, follow this link to register