|
Login | Register |
|
State soccer largely a private matterPosted Tuesday, November 18, 2008, at 3:50 PM
Of the 12 teams that will be playing soccer this weekend in the state tournament's three classifications, 10 are private schools -- including the entire semifinals fields for classes 1 and 2.
It makes one wonder how the public/private split voted on recently by the MSHSAA members didn't pass. Boys soccer is one of the sports that private schools dominate, along with boys and girls tennis, girls golf and to a lesser extent, boys golf and girls soccer. There have been 70 champions crowned in boys soccer -- including two co-championships -- and only seven have been won by public schools. The last was Oakville in Class 4 in 2000, before the split to three classifications for the 2002 season. Since the addition of a third class, 59 of the 84 teams that have made the final four have been private schools, and all 18 champions have been private schools. Public schools only once (2004) made up as much as half the field. This year's showing, with just two public schools in the largest classification, is the least since 2002, when just one public school made the Class 2 field while St. Louis' Metro Catholic Conference had three of the Class 3 final four. Three public schools went in 2003 -- one in each class -- the year Cape Central lost 3-2 to eventual champion St. Louis University High in two overtimes. In a couple of MSHSAA sports, I don't think it's a bad idea to contest brackets separately with a crossover game at the end of season. New York's state basketball tournament crowns a public school champion before pitting that team against the top private school or a school from New York City's public schools league for an overall championship. In order to continue encouraging smaller schools especially to take up the sport as a fall offering, it might be a good idea. Class 1 had the smallest public school representation at the state tournament, with just one team each year from 2003 to 2007 and none in 2002 or this year. In addition, private schools won six of eight districts in Class 2, and seven of eight -- including Missouri Military Academy -- in Class 1. That decreases the incentive for a school to add a sport with less chance of celebrating the success of a district championship, let alone any kind of state title. Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
The online sports editor for Semoball.com and former sports editor for the Southeast Missourian, Toby Carrig has been in the business of sports journalism for more than 25 years, including 14 years with the Suburban Journals in St. Louis.
Hot topics Some final food for thought: Top players in the area(11 ~ 10:22 AM, Mar 26)
Sikeston boys defeated by Borgia
Live from Park Hills: Meadow Heights wins
Live from Park Hills: Scott County drills St. Elizabeth 105-77
Sikeston's coach Holifield and Dickey Nutt
|
On a more local note, the two area teams advancing the farthest in the post-season this year were Saxony Lutheran and Cape Notre Dame, two private schools. Both won their respective districts, and Notre Dame is in the semifinals of Class 2.
I know it is another sport, but Tennessee does seperate the "types" of schools, into two distint divisions for football in their state.. Div 1 for public schools, and Div II for Private. They ran into the same senario , year in , year out, MUS Memphis University School) , Father Ryan, MBA ( Montgomery Bell Academy ) , and Brentwood Academy , could, in some years, play with Vandy..., they have moderate enrollments, but, in my opinion, openly recruit. I don't know if great soccer players , choose a school because of their opportunity to get more exposure, or play in playoff games, but the liklihood is greatly enhanced by their CHOOSING a school to go to , simply because they can afford it.and it is always competative in the sport.................sometimes it is because of their religeous preference. In any case, the stats you mentioned don't lie. And it does seem to create an unfair advantage.
How many of the 12 teams are from schools that also have football programs? Could that also be an issue?
I think Coach Wittenborn said it best last night in reference to you question bubba. He said with Notre Dame not having a football team, the soccer team gets the excellent athletes (paraphrasing here, forgive me). I think at bigger schools, especially those in KC and St. Louis, it's not that big of a deal because they have so many students. With the smaller big schools (in comparison I mean) it's more apathy. Some people just don't want to play high school ball (any sport) because of the coaches, or grades, or the rules. Just my thoughts on the matter.
Actually, of the 12 teams playing this weekend, only Notre Dame does not also have a football program.
ND lost to Helias in PKs.