I think most people would have Sikeston as the favorite tonight, but I do think it will be a good game. Has a District 2 team ever beat a District 1 team under the current playoff format?

i just just says what he said Bock Major. i say bullforgs in a nail bitter.

Farm

SIKESTON

Dexter

Ste. Genevieve

Caruthersville

Charleston

Hayti (I think Valle is really overrated)

Thayer

I don't think it is! I think Sikeston is much better than they played last week. They will rebound tonight

Ok, just a little insight to you all... Valle may be overated but hayti is not going to play within 20 points of Valle.. If anybody wants to bet that let me know.. Hayti lost games this year they normally don't and Valle beat everyone except St. Genevieve. Hayti barely beat Scott City and Chaffee.

I was saying to those who think Hayti will win.. I'm not giving any points or odds to anyone.. if u think Hayti will win put your money where your mouth is Bucko

they could potentially win but to think its more than a 2 % chance is crazy I say Valle 49-Hayti 16

if you's is so sure then why not give me 10 to won odds bucko! sounds just like jst sounds liek you do not want to put your money where your mouth is bucko.

i esho those sentimants cheeseheed. the thing about the tacklin is just to get in to postioni and use those arems in a rowing alligator techaniqe and nab those rb's coming through th e line. get those feet set and arms ready and thrust up and jump out and nab those jokers. no splaining needed about that is there Bucko?

Not really sure what you said bearcat1forall..hard to decode what said.

I wasn't trying to bash their pick... I have seen Hayti and Valle play so I thought I would let people know that Valle is much much better

I agree Matt. I think Crystal City is the favorite to win, and they probably will but I am picking with my heart on this one instead of my head. I really want a Charleston rematch!

Hey everyone,

I'm starting up a Cover It Live here if you want to join in: http://semoball.com/highschool/football/

Please tell me what "trash" I was talking about players? I saw these two players with my own eyes and what I said about them is true. How is that trashing? Was I talking about them personally? No! I am just like everyone else on here who see's flaws in people's game and I just brought them up like other people do. Where were you when fans from Charleston were talking about how #40 was going to run through our defense? How #1 was just to fast for us to contain? I guess you missed the parts where I said Charleston was greatly improved this season and how #81 could be a big time player. I guess you just pick out my negative things to say but fail to see the good things I have said. Also, I refuse to believe that you aren't a fan of Charleston. Just sounds like sour grapes to me. Also where did arm tackling come up? I never said anything about arm tackling. I said #40 was not a very good at breaking tackles. So I should not say my opinion on games in public? Apparently you must be new to the forum because I don't talk trash about anyone on here.I give praise to players who deserve it. You know, players like Watson from Sikeston and Stevens from Dexter. I support two teams in Semo, Caruthersville and Hayti. I don't hate any other team I just don't keep up with them like I do my two teams. I respect all high school programs in Semo. Maybe you need to stick around longer before you go off giving your expert opinion about who I like and who I don't like.

I have some to learn certain people are not allowed to give their opinion on here without backlash and I am one of them as are you Delo. And your right, it was the truth

Some people just freak out over nothing Cheese. You get used to it.

Cheesehead101 - I was just stating my point of view on how it seems that you dislike and talk negative (definition of trash) about Charleston players and nobody else. You have talked about how Charleston has greatly improved and you did indeed sir pick them to win against Crystal City, but I think it was only to just play Charleston again, not because you actually thought they could win. I honestly think it is obvious with your post about the flaws you saw after one game and that those flaws apparently went on for the entirety of the season. That's what I have a problem with. I'm not a Charleston fan believe what you want to. I'm a sports fan and a football fan and I love Friday nights. Sour grapes make good homemade wine, but they have no place or purpose for me to fire back in support of a team I've only read about from a local paper my brother in East Prairie sends me on Monday evenings. I fear that some areas and schools do not get credit because of where they are from and rumors associated with them. Caruthersville is one of those schools and areas. I was just reading this forum last night after the 9pm news and was just curious as to your motives for posting such comments that just sounded so negative to me. Forgive me for I have not read all of your post which I think if someone tried it would take the better part of a lifetime to read them. I'm just stating MY opinion which I think should be respected as I did yours and was just wondering and wanting an answer. That's all. I mentioned arm tackling because you made the comment that if a certain player was hit in the arm he would fumble it "most of the time." Where's is the evidence to support such a claim? Especially after seeing one game? That's all I'm saying. Do you not think that an arm of a ball carrier (regardless of what team they are playing for) isn't going to get hit in the arm on all of the plays? I'll make up a statistic about your theory/comment and say that "most of the time" is more than half. So if the player in question fumbled the balls on more than half of his carries (over the entirety of the season) then your theory/comment are proven correct. If not, then your theory/comment is busted. If you agreed then you just proved your "most of the time" theory/comment are incorrect and illogical, plain and simple. I don't have to give my expert opinion on which team you like and dislike. For one I'm not an expert and neither are you. Two, you have the Caruthersville Tiger logo picture. Three, the more post I read the more I think I'm glad I'm new on this forum. I hope to stay on this forum and have some good discussions in the future. I have not talked down about one person on this forum and I'm not going to. Just asking a question and making my argument and supporting my point.

Cheesehead can you just please shush it and not say anything thing else. You know you were dogging other players. I gives you props for trying to cover yourself up, but guess what it didn't work. Also, I have a question? Am I still spitting bs? Hahahahaha

GO BIG BLUE!!!!

Woah! Im starting to see the a sikeston-esque ganging up and arrogance from all the Caruthersville posters. Normally enjoy reading from them but I guess since theyre about the only ones left in the playoffs around here they are gonna let us know it.

Wait a minute. Cheese and I (including other Sikeston posters) have had our disagreements, but we have a mutual respect for each others' program. I don't think Cheese was trash talking a kid from Charleston or any kid for that matter. All he was relaying what he saw and a kid's relative weakness. To me.....that is not trash talking. Just my opinion......

Thanks Rocket! At least someone gets it